You need to login to submit an event!
Excitement has been steadily building for Danny Boyle’s 28 Years Later, the long-awaited third instalment in the iconic horror series. However, if you’re expecting anything similar to the first two – 28 Days Later and 28 Weeks Later – you may be severely disappointed.
Rather than retreading old ground, 28 Years Later is less about terrifyingly fast zombies (although, they are in this movie!) and leans into more philosophical territory, asking deeper questions about survival, identity, and the human condition. Disappointingly, you won’t find the same gore or white-knuckle tension that made the originals so iconic. With all that said, there are definitely highlights.
Ralph Fiennes brings intensity to his role. Alfie Williams, a young newcomer, also delivers a standout performance that’s completely believable. Some scenes even surprise with moments of dark humour that offer brief relief from the otherwise brooding tone. The action sequences (as sparse as they are) are filmed in Boyle’s signature style: fast frames, sharp cuts, and chaotic energy that keep you on edge. Technically, the film is incredibly well made.
The music is haunting and tense, and the cinematography is wonderful. It’s visually captivating and full of potential… but it’s definitely lacking in emotional payoff. It’s not a bad film, but it’s not a wholly satisfying one either.
Fans of the franchise may admire the ambition, but many will walk away feeling more puzzled than gripped.
6/10